OLD News

I’m sad to report that Colleen Lindsay is leaving FinePrint, and will no longer be my agent after this Friday. I’ll miss her, and I wish her all the luck in the world at her new position. Hopefully, we’ll still be able to remain in contact as friends.

But on the plus side, I’m remaining with FinePrint, and am now represented by the equally incomparable (those two words really don’t belong together, do they?) Janet Reid. I don’t know Janet that well, yet, but I’ve enjoyed speaking with her so far, and I’ve heard nothing but good things. I’m looking forward to a long, fun, and prosperous relationship.

(Emphasis on "long," since she’ll be my third agent in less than a year. 😛 😉 )

And suddenly, I’m desperately feeling the urge to run a D&D campaign where the PCs are all performers in a small traveling circus (acrobats = rogues, strongmen = fighters or barbarians, animal tamer = druid or beastmaster ranger, magician = wizard, etc.), who make a habit of not only entertaining the people in the villages they pass through, but also eliminating their monster troubles.

This could be the exhaustion talking…

If you’re not a fan of the Dark Sun D&D setting, this won’t mean much to you.

I’ve seen several people on various forums complaining about the removal of the in-depth backstory from the 4E incarnation of Dark Sun. These people felt that the complex and funky history is what made the setting work for them.

Well, okay. They’re welcome to feel that way, but me? I feel that ditching every last iota of that history was the best decision WotC could have made.

But not because I didn’t like it. I did like it. I just didn’t like it here.

Dark Sun, as created, was a setting for good, old-fashioned, harsh-and-violent sword-and-sandal fantasy roleplaying. Barsoom meets Dune meets D&D for a hot and sweaty three-way. And that was, and is, a great setting to have.

You know what ruins a setting like that?

1) Answers that remove all the mystery.

2) The sudden introduction of details that change the entire tenor of the world.

I don’t want to be reading a Conan story and suddenly have Robert Howard tell me that the world used to be a high-tech, cyberpunk-like society. I don’t want to be reading Lovecraft and suddenly have him explain that Cthulhu is actually a human being in a giant suit, who only wants to rule the world so that he can find love.

And damn it, I didn’t want to find out that Athas was a lush, green world which the halflings ruled via sci-fi level organic technology until a very specific and very detailed set of circumstances led to it becoming what it is.

A setting like Dark Sun should–no, must–leave its past mysterious. It needs to never give concrete answers about what happened, or the way things used to be. And it certainly never needs to suddenly become science-fiction. There are perfectly good places to mix sci-fi and fantasy, but an already established world–that people like for what it is–isn’t the place. It transforms a property that is X into one that is Y.

There’s nothing wrong with Y. Heck, I’d love to see a brand new setting predicated on all the specifics of old 2E Athas history. But it’s not what Athas was created to be, and it’s not conducive to the mood, the feel, and the stories that can best be told with Athas as X.

So there’s a "Who do you write like?" meme making the rounds. You paste a chunk of text into the analyzer, and it tells you whose work your own most resembles. It’s supposedly based on word choice.

It is, in fact, based on something that comes out of the back end of a bull in all sorts of fascinating shades of brown.

I just ran the analysis several times, on different samples of my writing. Each was multiple pages in length. And I got a different author almost every time. Apparently I write like Margaret Atwood and Leo Tolstoy and Rudyard Kipling and Vladamir Nabokov. Five samples, four authors. (I got Atwood twice.)

These are all samples from the same novel.

So, yeah, I think I’m quite content saying that

A) I write like me, and

B) This "analysis," even for a silly little Internet gizmo, is more than a tad flawed. 😛

Turns out the whole "Who Do You Write Like" meme was put in place by a vanity press, as a means of driving Google traffic to their links.

Just so you’re aware who you’re accidentally helping when you click on it. (Yeah, I had no idea either. Thanks to Jim Hines for pointing me to that link.)